On 25/10/2018 10:26, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
> 
>> To be honest, I find the second sentence in your rewrite even more
>> confusing.  It reads as if `reset.quiet` configuration variable 
>> can be used to restore the "show what is yet to be added"
>> behaviour, due to the parenthetical mention of the default behaviour
>> without any configuration.
>>
>>      The command reports what is yet to be added to the index
>>      after `reset` by default.  It can be made to only report
>>      errors with the `--quiet` option, or setting `reset.quiet`
>>      configuration variable to `true` (the latter can be
>>      overriden with `--no-quiet`).
>>
>> That may not be much better, though X-<.
> 
> In any case, the comments are getting closer to the bikeshedding
> territory, that can be easily addressed incrementally.  I am getting
> the impression that everbody agrees that the change is desirable,
> sufficiently documented and properly implemented.  
> 
> Shall we mark it for "Will merge to 'next'" in the what's cooking
> report and leave further refinements to incremental updates as
> needed?

Yeah, the first version gave me a 'huh?' moment (hence the
comment), the last version was better and, as you can see,
I am no great shakes at wordsmith-ing documentation! ;-)

Thanks!

ATB,
Ramsay Jones

Reply via email to