On 10/27/2018 3:10 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com>
---
preload-index.c | 15 ++-------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/preload-index.c b/preload-index.c
index 9e7152ab14..0e24886aca 100644
--- a/preload-index.c
+++ b/preload-index.c
@@ -7,17 +7,7 @@
#include "fsmonitor.h"
#include "config.h"
#include "progress.h"
-
-#ifdef NO_PTHREADS
-static void preload_index(struct index_state *index,
- const struct pathspec *pathspec,
- unsigned int refresh_flags)
-{
- ; /* nothing */
-}
-#else
-
-#include <pthread.h>
+#include "thread-utils.h"
/*
* Mostly randomly chosen maximum thread counts: we
@@ -108,7 +98,7 @@ static void preload_index(struct index_state *index,
struct thread_data data[MAX_PARALLEL];
struct progress_data pd;
- if (!core_preload_index)
+ if (!HAVE_THREADS || !core_preload_index)
I also "hoped in general that the non-threaded code paths could mostly
just collapse into the same as the "threads == 1" cases, and we wouldn't
have to "are threads even supported" in a lot of places."
In this case, if we cap the threads to online_cpus() the later test for
'if (threads < 2)' would do that. I haven't measured this specific case
but in the other cases I have measured, having more threads than cpus
did not result in a performance win.
return;
threads = index->cache_nr / THREAD_COST;
@@ -151,7 +141,6 @@ static void preload_index(struct index_state *index,
trace_performance_leave("preload index");
}
-#endif
int read_index_preload(struct index_state *index,
const struct pathspec *pathspec,
