Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:
> There is still one thing to settle. "revert -m1" could produce
> something like this
>
> This reverts commit <SHA1>, reversing
> changes made to <SHA2>.
I do not think it is relevant, with or without multiple parents, to
even attempt to read this message.
The description is not meant to be machine readable/parseable, but
is meant to be updated to describe the reason why the reversion was
made for human readers. Spending any cycle to attempt interpreting
it by machines will give a wrong signal to encourage people not to
touch it. Instead we should actively encourage people to take that
as the beginning of their description.
I even suspect that an update to that message to read something like
these
"This reverts commit <SHA-1> because FILL IN THE REASONS HERE"
"This reverts commit <SHA-1>, reversing changes made to
<SHA-1>, because FILL IN THE REASONS HERE"
would be a good idea. It of course is orthogonal to the topic of
introducing a new footer to record the "what happened" (without the
"why") in a machine-readable way.
