On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:50:30PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > tbo...@web.de writes: > > > > > This is a re-semd, the orignal patch was part of a 2 > > patch-series. > > This patch needed some rework, and here should be > > the polished version. > > Will queue.
Thanks, is there a chance to kill a typo here ? s/comopared/compared/ - A temporally variable "size" is used, promoted int uintmax_t and the comopared > Next time, please refrain from saying "re-send", if you > changed anything in the patch (or the log message), as the phrase > implies you are sending the same thing as before (just in case the > earlier one was not seen, for example). Marking it as vN+1 like you > did for this patch and having a reference to the original would make > it clear, though ;-) Sorry for the confusion. The next time I will not send unrelated patches as a series, so that we have a better "Message-ID:" and "In-Reply-To:" flow (which should make live 3% easier). https://public-inbox.org/git/20181029165914.2677-1-tbo...@web.de/ https://public-inbox.org/git/20181109174110.27630-1-tbo...@web.de/
