Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes: > You misunderstand. In this case it is crucial to read the regression test > first. The fix does not make much sense before one understands the > condition under which the order of the code statements matters.
I am not sure what you mean. It sounds as if you want to use diff-orderfile to present change for t/ before changes to other files are presented in format-patch output to help readers, and I think that may make sense for certain cases. It may even include this case. But that is not incompatible with "avoid showing the patch that updates the code to fix breakages separately, ending up with showing the changes to t/ that are mostly about s/_failure/_success/ and readers are forced to go back to the previous patch to remind themselves what the broken scenario was about; by keeping it in a single patch, the readers can get the tests in one piece".
