SZEDER Gábor <[email protected]> writes:
>> + if (tmp_allowed_versions[0] != config_version)
>> + for (int i = 1; i < nr_allowed_versions; i++)
>
> We don't do C99 yet, thus the declaration of a loop variable like this
> is not allowed and triggers compiler errors.
I thought we did a weather-balloon to see if this bothers people who
build on minority platforms but
git grep 'for (int'
is coming up empty.
We have been trying designated initializers with weather-balloon
changes (both arrays and struct fields) and I somehow thought that
we already were trying this out, but apparently that is not the
case. Also trailing comma in the enum definition was what we
discussed earlier but I do not know if we had weather-balloon for it
or not offhand.
Perhaps we should write these down in CodingGuidelines.
