On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 07:54:32PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > I think that if we use the "principle of least surprise," insteadOf > > rules shouldn't be applied for git-request-pull URLs. > > I haven't used request-pull so I don't have much of an opinion on this, > but do you think the same applies to 'git remote get-url <remote>'? > > I.e. should it also show the original unmunged URL, or the munged one as > it does now?
I don't know, maybe both? As opposed to git-request-pull, this is not exposing the insteadOf URL to someone other than the person who set it up, so even if it does return the munged URL, it wouldn't be unexpected. -K
