Am 03.12.18 um 02:15 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Frank Schäfer <fschaefer....@googlemail.com> writes: > >> Hi Junio, >> >> Am 29.11.18 um 03:11 schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> [...] >>> This was misspoken a bit. Let's revise it to >>> >>> When producing a colored output (not limited to whitespace >>> error coloring of diff output) for contents that are not >>> marked as eol=crlf (and other historical means), insert >>> <RESET> before a CR that comes immediately before a LF. >> You mean >> ... >> <RESET> *after* a CR that comes immediately before a LF." >> >> OK, AFAICS this produces the desired output in all cases if eol=lf. > OK, yeah, I think I meant "after", i.e. ... CR <RESET> LF, in order > to force CR to be separated from LF. > >> Now what about the case eol=crlf ? > I have no strong opinions, other than that "LF in repository, CRLF > in working tree" would make the issue go away (when it is solved for > EOL=LF like the above, that is). > >> Keeping the current behavior of '-' lines is correct. >> But shouldn't ^M now be suppressed in '+' lines for a consistent behavior ? > If "LF in repository, CRLF in working tree" is done, there would not > be ^M at the end of the line, not just for removed lines, but also > for added lines, no? Just to be sure that I'm not missing anything here: What's your definition of "LF in repository, CRLF in working tree" in terms of config parameters ?
Regards, Frank
