On 12/6/2018 3:20 PM, Josh Steadmon wrote:
+
+# usage: corrupt_and_zero_graph_then_verify <corrupt_position> <data>
<zero_position> <string>
+# Manipulates the commit-graph file at <corrupt_position> by inserting the
data,
+# then zeros the file starting at <zero_position>. Finally, runs
+# 'git commit-graph verify' and places the output in the file 'err'. Tests
'err'
+# for the given string.
+corrupt_and_zero_graph_then_verify() {
This method is very similar to to 'corrupt_graph_and_verify()', the only
difference being the zero_pos, which zeroes the graph.
Could it instead be a modification of corrupt_graph_and_verify() where
$4 is interpreted as zero_pos, and if it is blank we don't do the
truncation?
+test_expect_success 'detect truncated graph' '
+ corrupt_and_zero_graph_then_verify $GRAPH_BYTE_CHUNK_COUNT "\xff" \
+ $GRAPH_CHUNK_LOOKUP_OFFSET "chunk lookup table entry missing"
+'
+
Thanks for this! I think it's valuable to keep explicit tests around
that were discovered from your fuzz tests. Specifically, I can repeat
the test when I get around to the next file format.
Thanks,
-Stolee
