Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> + default: >>> + return; >>> + } >>> + for (; first <= last; first++) >> >> This looks odd. If you use the usual last+1 convention between the >> caller and callee, you do not have to do this, or call this function >> with "i - 1" and "list->nr -1" as the last parameter. > > I know. I just don't know how to name the variable to say "the element > after the last one".
In case it was unclear, by the "usual last+1 convention", I meant that it is perfectly normal to write for (i = first; i < last; i++) for (i = begin; i < end; i++) in C. Saying these as for (i = first; i < beyond_last; i++) for (i = begin; i < beyond_end; i++) look non-C. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html