On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 02:35:03AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> > Fair enough.  Forcing later users to reattempt parsing (and failing
> > the same way) would be safer and it should also be sufficient as we
> > are talking about how to handle a broken repository, i.e. an error
> > case.
> 
> One of the tricky things, and the reason I used a "corrupt" flag in my
> earlier sketch, is that the state after we encounter a parse error is
> unknown. So imagine parse_commit_buffer() sees that one of the parent
> lines is bogus, and we return an error. The caller gets to see whatever
> half-parsed state we managed to come up with.
> 
> So far so good. But now imagine we call parse_commit_buffer() again, and
> we re-parse. How does that interact with the half-parsed state? Some of
> it works OK (e.g., lookup_tree() would find the same tree). Some not so
> much (I think we'd keep appending parents at each call).
> 
> I guess this might not be too bad to handle. Value fields like
> timestamp_t are OK to overwrite. Pointers to objects likewise, since the
> memory is owned elsewhere. If we see existing parent pointers in an
> object we're parsing, we could probably free them under the assumption
> they're leftover cruft. Likewise for the "tag" field of "struct tag",
> which is owned by the struct and should be freed.
> 
> Blobs and trees don't actually parse anything into their structs. So
> it's really just special-casing those two items.

So here's something a bit more concrete to play with. Using the patch
below, we maintain the invariant that if you called parse_commit() or
equivalent and got a successful return, then commit->tree is always
non-NULL. That fixes the second "missing tree" test from elsewhere in
this thread:

  
https://public-inbox.org/git/042a8ba8b2a98c269f9cd1a8e88488b80d686f0d.1567720960.git...@ttaylorr.com/

_without_ applying the third patch (though the error message we expect
in the test does not tweaked). And it likely also protects most of the
other callers of get_commit_tree_oid(), assuming somewhere in their code
path they call parse_commit() and actually check the error code.

Likewise, tag->tagged is always non-NULL after a successful tag parse,
which should fix the segfault discussed recently in:

  https://public-inbox.org/git/20190824230944.ga14...@jessup.stsp.name/

as well as probably others.

And callers are still able to view the broken objects, but they have to
ignore the error return from the parse functions.

This seems like a promising direction. I'd probably break it into a few
separate patches, and it would be nice to have some tests (especially
one where we actually do try to parse multiple times).

---
diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
index a98de16e3d..47e36fd13e 100644
--- a/commit.c
+++ b/commit.c
@@ -398,20 +398,37 @@ int parse_commit_buffer(struct repository *r, struct 
commit *item, const void *b
        struct object_id parent;
        struct commit_list **pptr;
        struct commit_graft *graft;
+       struct tree *tree;
        const int tree_entry_len = the_hash_algo->hexsz + 5;
        const int parent_entry_len = the_hash_algo->hexsz + 7;
 
        if (item->object.parsed)
                return 0;
-       item->object.parsed = 1;
+
+       if (item->parents) {
+               /*
+                * Presumably this is leftover from an earlier failed parse;
+                * clear it out in preparation for us re-parsing (we'll hit the
+                * same error, but that's good, since it lets our caller know
+                * the result cannot be trusted.
+                */
+               free_commit_list(item->parents);
+               item->parents = NULL;
+       }
+
        tail += size;
        if (tail <= bufptr + tree_entry_len + 1 || memcmp(bufptr, "tree ", 5) ||
                        bufptr[tree_entry_len] != '\n')
                return error("bogus commit object %s", 
oid_to_hex(&item->object.oid));
        if (get_oid_hex(bufptr + 5, &parent) < 0)
                return error("bad tree pointer in commit %s",
                             oid_to_hex(&item->object.oid));
-       set_commit_tree(item, lookup_tree(r, &parent));
+       tree = lookup_tree(r, &parent);
+       if (!tree)
+               return error("bad tree pointer %s in commit %s",
+                            oid_to_hex(&parent),
+                            oid_to_hex(&item->object.oid));
+       set_commit_tree(item, tree);
        bufptr += tree_entry_len + 1; /* "tree " + "hex sha1" + "\n" */
        pptr = &item->parents;
 
@@ -450,6 +467,7 @@ int parse_commit_buffer(struct repository *r, struct commit 
*item, const void *b
        if (check_graph)
                load_commit_graph_info(r, item);
 
+       item->object.parsed = 1;
        return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/tag.c b/tag.c
index 5db870edb9..3dcebb4715 100644
--- a/tag.c
+++ b/tag.c
@@ -141,7 +141,11 @@ int parse_tag_buffer(struct repository *r, struct tag 
*item, const void *data, u
 
        if (item->object.parsed)
                return 0;
-       item->object.parsed = 1;
+
+       if (item->tag) {
+               /* Left over from an earlier failed parse */
+               FREE_AND_NULL(item->tag);
+       }
 
        if (size < the_hash_algo->hexsz + 24)
                return -1;
@@ -167,10 +171,15 @@ int parse_tag_buffer(struct repository *r, struct tag 
*item, const void *data, u
        } else if (!strcmp(type, tag_type)) {
                item->tagged = (struct object *)lookup_tag(r, &oid);
        } else {
-               error("Unknown type %s", type);
-               item->tagged = NULL;
+               return error("unknown tag type '%s' in %s",
+                            type, oid_to_hex(&item->object.oid));
        }
 
+       if (!item->tagged)
+               return error("bad tag pointer to %s in %s",
+                            oid_to_hex(&oid),
+                            oid_to_hex(&item->object.oid));
+
        if (bufptr + 4 < tail && starts_with(bufptr, "tag "))
                ;               /* good */
        else
@@ -187,6 +196,7 @@ int parse_tag_buffer(struct repository *r, struct tag 
*item, const void *data, u
        else
                item->date = 0;
 
+       item->object.parsed = 1;
        return 0;
 }
 

Reply via email to