On 9/12/2019 10:23 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 08:23:49AM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
>
>>> That creates an interesting problem for commits that have _already_ been
>>> parsed using the commit graph. Their commit->object.parsed flag is set,
>>> their commit->graph_pos is set, but their commit->maybe_tree may still
>>> be NULL. When somebody later calls repo_get_commit_tree(), we see that
>>> we haven't loaded the tree oid yet and try to get it from the commit
>>> graph. But since it has been freed, we segfault!
>>
>> OOPS! That is certainly a bad thing. I'm glad you found it, but I
>> am sorry for how you (probably) found it.
>
> Heh. I'll admit it was quite a slog of debugging, but _most_ of that was
> figuring out in which circumstance we'd have actually parsed the object.
> Finding the problematic end state was pretty easy from a coredump. :)
>
>>> diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c
>>> index 9b02d2c426..bc5dd5913f 100644
>>> --- a/commit-graph.c
>>> +++ b/commit-graph.c
>>> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
>>> #define GRAPH_MIN_SIZE (GRAPH_HEADER_SIZE + 4 * GRAPH_CHUNKLOOKUP_WIDTH \
>>> + GRAPH_FANOUT_SIZE + the_hash_algo->rawsz)
>>>
>>> +static int commit_graph_disabled;
>>
>> Should we be putting this inside the repository struct instead?
>
> Probably. The only caller will just pass the_repository, but it doesn't
> hurt to scope it down now.
>
> It could potentially go into the commit_graph itself, but it looks like
> with the incremental work we may have multiple such structs. It could
> also go into raw_object_store, but I think conceptually it's a
> repo-level thing.
>
> So I put it straight into "struct repository".
>
>> Your patch does not seem to actually cover the "I've already parsed some
>> commits"
>> case, as you are only preventing the commit-graph from being prepared.
>> Instead,
>> we need to have a short-circuit inside parse_commit() to avoid future parsing
>> from the commit-graph file.
>
> Maybe I was too clever, then. :)
>
> I didn't want to have to sprinkle "are we disabled" in parse_commit(),
> etc. But any such uses of the commit graph have to do:
>
> if (!prepare_commit_graph(r))
> return;
>
> to lazy-load it. So the logic to prepare becomes (roughly):
>
> if (disabled)
> return 0;
> if (already_loaded)
> return 1;
> return actually_load() ? 1 : 0;
>
> and "disabled" takes precedence.
>
> I've added this comment in prepare_commit_graph():
>
> /*
> * This must come before the "already attempted?" check below, because
> * we want to disable even an already-loaded graph file.
> */
> if (r->commit_graph_disabled)
> return 0;
>
> if (r->objects->commit_graph_attempted)
> return !!r->objects->commit_graph;
> r->objects->commit_graph_attempted = 1;
>
> Does that make more sense?
Ah. That does make sense. I now see the connection between parsing and this
change.
> Unrelated, but I also notice the top of prepare_commit_graph() has:
>
> if (git_env_bool(GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD, 0))
> die("dying as requested by the '%s' variable on commit-graph
> load!",
> GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD);
>
> as the very first thing. Meaning we're calling getenv() as part of every
> single parse_commit(), rather than just once per process. Seems like an
> easy efficiency win.
Absolutely. Move this to after the "have we attempted already?" condition.
Thanks,
-Stolee
