On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:10 PM Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Elijah Newren <new...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I see you picked up this corrected series in pu; thanks. However,
> > your merge commit, 2a99d6b6ff7c ("Merge branch
> > 'en/fast-imexport-nested-tags' into pu", 2019-10-02), claims "Seems to
> > break t9300 when merged to 'pu'.". I know v1 did that and I could
> > reproduce, but I can't reproduce any failures here. Was this message
> > just left over or is there some problem you are seeing?
>
> I thought that the latest What's cooking written after you sent the
> corrected version hasn't been sent yet.
>
> And the draft copy I locally have for the next issue of what's cooking
> has the comment removed already.
>
> Anything I missed?
I was looking at the commit message for the merge commit where you
merged in v2 of the series, and was surprised to see the commit
message claim there was still breakage with the new version of the
series:
$ git log -1 2a99d6b6ff7c
commit 2a99d6b6ff7cd29cc41d587ae737ffb8e7babea4
Merge: 7d81b61dd0 0e2eeb4cb4
Author: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
Date: Wed Oct 2 16:08:06 2019 +0900
Merge branch 'en/fast-imexport-nested-tags' into pu
Updates to fast-import/export.
Seems to break t9300 when merged to 'pu'.
* en/fast-imexport-nested-tags:
fast-export: handle nested tags
t9350: add tests for tags of things other than a commit
fast-export: allow user to request tags be marked with --mark-tags
fast-export: add support for --import-marks-if-exists
fast-import: add support for new 'alias' command
fast-import: allow tags to be identified by mark labels
fast-import: fix handling of deleted tags
fast-export: fix exporting a tag and nothing else
