> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:22:27PM +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote: > I hear you: I had a brief encounter with Mercurial not that long ago, > and there were several things that didn't work the way I expected (or > rather: the way I got used to with Git). The subtle and sometimes > not-so-subtle differences between the concepts and philosophy of the > two systems might very well explain why Git didn't work the way you > expected.
> However, it's impossible to give any explanation or advice without > knowing more about the situation, e.g. at least the exact commands > that you run and what they outputted, if you still have them or at > least if you can still reproduce the issue. (with potentially > sensitive URLs and/or branchnames redacted, if necessary). Thanks for your answer. Could you please try out git clone https://git.code.sf.net/p/matlab-emacs/src matlab-emacs-hg Then you will see That git log --graph and git log --graph --all Are giving two different results and I don't understand why the branch is not shown when using git log --graph Funny thing is when I use the hg-git plugin and run hg clone https://git.code.sf.net/p/matlab-emacs/src matlab-emacs-hg I see this branch, converted to a hg bookmark.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
