Hi Junio,

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> "William Baker via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgad...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > This is the second iteration of changes to fix the segfault that I
> > encountered while testing fsmonitor. This iteration includes the following
> > updates for feedback I received on v1:
> >
> >  * Use %u instead of %"PRIuMAX" for unsigned ints in BUG format strings
> >  * Updated the new test's comment to be more descriptive
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > William
> >
> > William Baker (1):
> >   fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
>
> Thanks.  Dscho, is this still Reviewed-by: you?

Yes!

Thanks,
Dscho

P.S.: I guess we could even go and make this a `Co-Authored-by:` because
the test case is actually by me, at least originally... ;-)

>
> >
> >  fsmonitor.c                 | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  t/t7519/fsmonitor-env       | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
> >
> >
> > base-commit: 5fa0f5238b0cd46cfe7f6fa76c3f526ea98148d9
> > Published-As: 
> > https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-372%2Fwilbaker%2Ffix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
> > Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git 
> > pr-372/wilbaker/fix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
> > Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/372
> >
> > Range-diff vs v1:
> >
> >  1:  ce9bf4237e ! 1:  08741d986c fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries 
> > to be removed
> >      @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
> >       +     struct cache_entry *ce;
> >       +
> >       +     if (pos >= istate->cache_nr)
> >      -+             BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index 
> > (%"PRIuMAX" >= %"PRIuMAX")",
> >      -+                 (uintmax_t)pos, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> >      ++             BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index 
> > (%"PRIuMAX" >= %u)",
> >      ++                 (uintmax_t)pos, istate->cache_nr);
> >
> >       +     ce = istate->cache[pos];
> >             ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_FSMONITOR_VALID;
> >      @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
> >             istate->fsmonitor_dirty = fsmonitor_dirty;
> >
> >       +     if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
> >      -+             BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index 
> > (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> >      -+                 (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, 
> > (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> >      ++             BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index 
> > (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> >      ++                 (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, 
> > istate->cache_nr);
> >       +
> >             trace_printf_key(&trace_fsmonitor, "read fsmonitor extension 
> > successful");
> >             return 0;
> >      @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@
> >             int fixup = 0;
> >
> >       +     if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
> >      -+             BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index 
> > (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> >      -+                 (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, 
> > (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> >      ++             BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index 
> > (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> >      ++                 (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, 
> > istate->cache_nr);
> >       +
> >             put_be32(&hdr_version, INDEX_EXTENSION_VERSION);
> >             strbuf_add(sb, &hdr_version, sizeof(uint32_t));
> >      @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@
> >
> >                             /* Mark all previously saved entries as dirty */
> >       +                     if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > 
> > istate->cache_nr)
> >      -+                             BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries 
> > than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> >      -+                                 
> > (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> >      ++                             BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries 
> > than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> >      ++                                 
> > (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
> >                             ewah_each_bit(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, 
> > fsmonitor_ewah_callback, istate);
> >
> >                             /* Now mark the untracked cache for fsmonitor 
> > usage */
> >      @@ -109,8 +109,9 @@
> >             test_cmp expect actual
> >        '
> >
> >      -+# Use test files that start with 'z' so that the entries being added
> >      -+# and removed appear at the end of the index.
> >      ++# This test covers staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of 
> > the index.
> >      ++# Test files with names beginning with 'z' are used under the 
> > assumption that
> >      ++# earlier tests do not add/leave index entries that sort below them.
> >       +test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
> >       +     test_commit initial &&
> >       +     removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
>

Reply via email to