> > Any reason why the names are renamed to omit "PICKAXE_"? In particular,
> > these names are still global, so it is good to retain the extra context.
> > 
> > (This doesn't mean that you are wrong to remove them - I just gave my
> > opinion, and a reason for my opinion. If you had a reason to remove
> > them, you can mention that, and we can discuss this together. Or, if you
> > read my reason and agree with it, you can say that and put the
> > "PICKAXE_" back.)
> > 
> I wasn't really sure about omitting the "PICKAXE_" prefix, but I looked
> at some of the other defined enums and it seemed like what would act as
> the prefix in #defines was only used in the enum declaration. For
> example I looked at:
>       enum apply_ws_error_action {
>               nowarn_ws_error,
>               warn_on_ws_error,
>               die_on_ws_error,
>               correct_ws_error
>       };
> 
> For comparison, I took "apply_" as the prefix that would translate to 
> "#define APPLY_" which isn't included in the member variables.
> I do agree about retaining the extra context though, so I can definitely put 
> the
> "PICKAXE_" back.

[snip]

> > In Git, we often look at historical commits, so it is good to keep
> > history as clean as possible. In particular, we shouldn't move things
> > around unless we have another reason to. Here, for example, you are
> > moving the constants from above BLAME_DEFAULT_* to below. You should
> > move them back. (Or if you have a reason for moving, mention that and we
> > can discuss it.)
> > 
> I'll move them back. I have experience with all the "#define" constants
> being immediately after the "#includes" which is why I moved them, but I'll
> try to stick to the
> convention from now on.

Thanks for providing your justifications.

> > Also, I have a slight preference for putting "= 02" on the BLAME_COPY
> > line but that is not necessary.
> > 
> Noted.

Well, Junio provides a good reason for putting "= 02" [1], so please do
that.

[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqsgnzj4vs....@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/

Reply via email to