Am 3/6/2013 15:42, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:24:18PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> Am 3/6/2013 11:16, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
>>>     ++<<<<<<< ours
>>>      +ssize_t xread(int fd, void *buf, size_t count)
>>>      +{
>>>      +      ssize_t ret, done = 0;
>>>      +
>>>      +retry:
>>>      +      ret = read(fd, buf + done, count - done);
>>>      +      if (ret < 0)
>>>      +              return ret;
>>>      +
>>>      +      done += ret;
>>>      +
>>>      +      if (ret == 0 /* EOF */ || done == count)
>>>      +              return done;
>>>      +      else
>>>      +              goto retry;
>>>      +}
>>>      +
>>>     ++||||||| base
>>>     ++=======
>>>     + #include "common.h"
>>>     + 
>>>     ++>>>>>>> theirs
>>>       int main(int argc,char *argv[])
>>>       {
>>>             int fd, val, ret, size, wrote, len;
>>>
>>> This is the same conflict as the first one, just with ours and theirs
>>> exchanged. So my suggestion is to make rerere use the resolution
>>> recorded for the first conflict here.
>>>
>>> Sounds sensible?
>>
>> Of course, and rerere already does it. But only when you use git's default
>> conflict markers rather than diff3 style markers that have this extra
>> ||||| line.
> I only did git checkout --conflict=diff3 after the merge conflict
> happend. So I cannot confirm that git already does it.
> 
> So here is a reproduction receipe:
> 
>       git clone git://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git
>       cd mtd-utils
>       git checkout ca39eb1
>       wget -O patch1 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/45779/raw
>       wget -O patch2 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/45591/raw

At least patch2 has incorret index information; it does not apply with am
-3. I generated a working version with format-patch after applying it
directly on top of ca39eb1.

>       for p in patch1 patch2; do perl -p -i -e 'print "From tralala Mon Sep 
> 17 00:00:00 2001\n" if $. == 1' $p; done

Do you have rerere enabled at this point?

        git config rerere.enabled true

>       git am patch1
>       git am -3 patch2 # first merge conflict
>       perl -n -i -e 's/=======//; print unless /^[<>]{7} /;' 
> flash_otp_write.c # resolve
>       git add flash_otp_write.c
>       git am --resolved
>       git rebase -i ca39eb1 # swap order of the two patches
> 
> results in
> 
>       $ git ls-files -u
>       100644 f360a3e025deaf7acfb7b20c9fad90f498ae4430 1       
> flash_otp_write.c
>       100644 d407ebbf400e630dc00ee004ecb44be8af51b25d 2       
> flash_otp_write.c
>       100644 31b963e2d6cf0016ca542529886e1ee71a22664e 3       
> flash_otp_write.c

Same here.

> 
> and resolving yields:
> 
>       $ git ls-files -s flash_otp_write.c
>       100644 648e0422d21c0ffa7621f82b86c02a065e488293 0       
> flash_otp_write.c

OK.

> 
> Then
>       git rebase --continue 
> 
> gives the 2nd rebase conflict:
> 
>       $ git ls-files -u
>       100644 d407ebbf400e630dc00ee004ecb44be8af51b25d 1       
> flash_otp_write.c
>       100644 648e0422d21c0ffa7621f82b86c02a065e488293 2       
> flash_otp_write.c
>       100644 f360a3e025deaf7acfb7b20c9fad90f498ae4430 3       
> flash_otp_write.c

Same here.

> 
> Now knowing from the previous resolution that with base=f360a3e0
> (= origin + patch1) merging
> 
>       d407ebbf (= origin) and
>       31b963e2 (= origin + patch1 + patch2)
> 
> gives 648e0422 (origin + patch2),
> git could know that with base=d407ebbf (origin) merging 648e0422 (origin
> + patch1) and f360a3e0 (origin + patch1) gives 31b963e2 (origin + patch1
> + patch2) again.

For me, it works as expected, i.e., I get the conflict resolved by rerere.

> 
> And git doesn't prepare 31b963e2 in flash_otp_write.c for me.
> 
> @Johannes, do you have some non-standard setting, or can you reproduce?

Perhaps:

$ git config --global -l | grep rerere
rerere.enabled=true

-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to