Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hm, should this be the default?
>>
>> In principle, I would expect
>>
>> git checkout -- .
>>
>> to make the worktree match the index, respecting the sparse checkout.
>> And something like
>>
>> git checkout --widen -- .
>>
>> to change the sparse checkout pattern.
[...]
> Changing the default may involve a painful transition phase (e.g. "add
> -u").
I don't think it needs to. There aren't many people using sparse
checkout even these days, and I think they'd generally be happy about
the change.
But if we want to be conservative until some later point (like 2.1),
perhaps --sparse should be named something like --no-widen? That
way, I can do
git checkout --no-widen -- .
to make the worktree match the index, respecting the sparse checkout.
And I can do
git checkout --widen -- .
to change the sparse checkout pattern. Meanwhile the confusing
command
git checkout -- .
would be ill-defined for sparse checkouts --- in past git versions,
if I understand you correctly it acted like --widen, while in some
unspecified future version it may change to mean --no-widen. No
need for warnings because I doubt anyone is relying on either
behavior.
Would that work?
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
