Sebastian Götte <ja...@physik.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> static void parse_gpg_output(struct signature_check *sigc)
> {
> - const char *buf = sigc->gpg_status;
> int i;
>
> + /* Iterate over all search strings */
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sigcheck_gpg_status); i++) {
> + const char *found = sigc->gpg_status;
> +
> + /* Iterate over all lines */
> + do {
> + if (!prefixcmp(found, sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check)) {
> + const char *next;
> +
> + found += strlen(sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check);
> + sigc->check_result =
> sigcheck_gpg_status[i].result;
> + sigc->key = xmemdupz(found, 16);
> + found += 17;
> + next = strchrnul(found, '\n');
> + sigc->signer = xmemdupz(found, next - found);
> + return;
> + }
> + found = strchr(found, '\n')+1;
> + } while(found-1);
Yuck. That termination condition is horrible.
Honestly speaking, I find the one I suggested the other day (which
has been queued on 'pu') much nicer than this loop.
If you really really want to do a line at a time, discarding the
"allow strstr() to scan over multiple lines" optimization, it is
more natural to iterate over buffer one line at a time, and check
for each expected output with an inner loop, perhaps like this:
const char *cp = buf;
while (*cp) {
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sig_check); i++) {
if (!prefixcmp(cp, sig_check[i].check) &&
parse_gpg_status(sigc, cp, &sig_check[i]))
return;
}
cp = strchrnul(cp, '\n');
if (*cp)
cp++;
}
But I do not see much point in doing so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
