Jed Brown <j...@59a2.org> writes: > ... I felt that it was wildly oversold and that putting it into > git.git was premature. > > I tried gitifyhg later and it basically worked out of the box. All > known problems were marked by 'xfail' test cases. At that time, > remote-hg failed almost all the gitifyhg tests. I contributed a few > things to gitifyhg, including the notes support (essential when talking > via email with other people using Mercurial). Since then, the last > major project I'm involved with has switched to Git so I rarely need > gitifyhg or remote-hg any more. > > FWIW, I also thought Dusty's original announcement oversold gitifyhg, but > it was closer to the truth and upon cloning the repo, it was more clear > what didn't work.
So,... is there a concrete proposal for _me_ to act on? Do you want to see contrib/remtote-hg out of my tree, and have it compete with the other one (which also shouldn't be in my tree) in the open? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
