On 04/15/2013 07:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes: > >> The old version was inconsistent: when a reference was >> REF_KNOWS_PEELED but with a null peeled value, it returned non-zero >> for the current reference but zero for other references. Change the >> behavior for non-current references to match that of current_ref, >> which is what callers expect. Document the behavior. >> >> Current callers did not trigger the previously-buggy behavior. > > Is that because we were lucky by codeflow, or is it just that we > didn't have a testcase to trigger the behaviour?
Existing callers only called peel_ref() from within a for_each_ref-style iteration and only for the current ref. Therefore the buggy code path was impossible to reach. I will note that in the commit message. Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
