Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> I think "branch names" was an attempt to make it more newbie >>> friendly by sacrificing technical accuracy. With the suggested >>> update (see the review for the previous one), it would be easier to >>> read if this part said "options or the revision range". >> >> Why does it have to be a range? It might well be a list of revisions, > > Study "Specifying Ranges" section of gitrevisions and come back, > perhaps?
A bit more specifically, there is a reason why we list "Specifying Revisions" and "Specifying Ranges" separately in that manual page. I think you are trying explain "git log --short A B ^C" as if it takes "--short" (which is an option), "A", "B", and "^C" (all of which are revisions). And I am saying that is wrong. It is "--short" (which is an option) and "A B ^C" (which is a revision range). "git log --short A" is taking "--short" (an option) and "A". This "A" is still a revision range and not a single revision. It is a single commit that is used to name a revision range which is the entire history behind the commit "A". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
