Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> writes: > We currently assume that, if a $dotest directory exists, an am had > been called earlier. This assumption might get our conditional to > match a stray $dotest directory created somewhere else,...
Hmm. that explanation sounds like that is sweeping a real issue under the rug. Shouldn't your patch fixing that creator of the stray one? That stray one that errorneously creates $dotest, even when it is not applying patch messages, may create the directory with 'last' but without 'next' or the messages, so checking only 'last' does not sound like solving any problem. If this were done as a part of an addition that has to create $dotest even when it does not (yet) deposit patches in there, the way that particular addition creates and uses $dotest may justify why testing only 'last' is sufficient. But as a standalone change, neither the patch text or the above explanation makes much sense to me. > diff --git a/git-am.sh b/git-am.sh > index 88aa438..f4ef8fc 100755 > --- a/git-am.sh > +++ b/git-am.sh > @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ then > rm -fr "$dotest" > fi > > -if test -d "$dotest" > +if test -d "$dotest" && test -f "$dotest/last" > then > case "$#,$skip$resolved$abort" in > 0,*t*) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
