On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Martin Langhoff <martin.langh...@gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > When I do git pull, git is careful to only update the branch I have > checked out (if appropriate). It leaves any other branches that track > branches on the remote that has just been fetched untouched. I always > thought that at some point git pull would learn to evaluate those > branches and auto-merge them if the merge is a ff. > > I would find that a natural bit of automation in git pull. Of course > it would mean a change of semantics, existing scripts could be > affected.
I agree. I've been using this script for quite a while now: <https://github.com/jszakmeister/etc/blob/master/git-addons/git-ffwd> I've been pretty happy with it. It's not of my own design, I picked up from StackOverflow: <http://stackoverflow.com/a/9076361/683080> And made a couple of minor tweaks to cope with my configuration (I have merge setup to not fast-forward merge by default). -John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
