Junio C Hamano wrote: > But the output from passing "-v" before the test that breaks is not > very useful for two reasons.
I sometimes checkout the Good branch in a different worktree, compare the output/ state of the passing test with the failing one. I've never really found the outputs from earlier tests enlightening. From my experience, the failure is often due to an earlier test not imposing tighter passing conditions: but because it's shell, the debugging time is very small. I always just patch-locally and run. I'm not sure how to make the testing framework more useful. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
