Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Especially I did not check if there are >> still undesirable data loss behaviour in corner cases that people >> were worried about in the discussion. > > Check the tests. What am I missing?
I didn't do a thorough check, but my earlier comments are taken into account, I didn't see anything wrong and the tests in 7/7 are good. >> Perhaps "rebase" can be taught to be more careful when checking >> if local changes may overlap with the changes being replayed. > > Frankly, I don't know if it's worth the effort. It might be a nice > theoretical exercise, but what tangible benefit do I get as the end > user (now that I have rebase.autostash)? In fact, I'll probably be > slowing down the interactive rebase noticeably by executing a > diff-tree at every step. And for what? One benefit would be to avoid triggering rebuild (and editor reload) by keeping the timestamps intact. But I agree it's probably not worth the effort (and definitely isn't in the scope of this series). -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
