Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
> Let's show the output so it's clear why it failed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com>
> ---
> t/t3400-rebase.sh | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/t3400-rebase.sh b/t/t3400-rebase.sh
> index b58fa1a..fb39531 100755
> --- a/t/t3400-rebase.sh
> +++ b/t/t3400-rebase.sh
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ test_expect_success 'default to @{upstream} when upstream
> arg is missing' '
> test_expect_success 'rebase -q is quiet' '
> git checkout -b quiet topic &&
> git rebase -q master >output.out 2>&1 &&
> + cat output.out &&
> test ! -s output.out
> '
It is one thing to avoid squelching output that naturally comes out
of command being tested unnecessarily, so that "./txxxx-*.sh -v"
output can be used for debugging. I however am not sure if adding
"cat" to random places like this is a productive direction for us to
go in.
A more preferrable alternative may be adding something like this to
test-lib.sh and call it from here and elsewhere (there are about 50
places that do "test ! -s <filename>"), perhaps?
test_must_be_an_empty_file () {
if test -s "$1"
then
cat "$1"
false
fi
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
