On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> There's nothing wrong with me choosing how best to spend my time. Really. > > Ofcourse you are. You have arguably spent it very productively > solving a lot of user issues (especially remote-bzr). > > Personally, I try to do the minimum amount of boring work required to > make sure that a good series gets in. Sometimes this is a little high > (for a recent example, see my pickaxe-doc series). The result being > that I just won't work on documentation in the future because doing > iterations is so piss boring: the git community needs to recognize > this problem and make amends. I don't mind doing as many iterations as it takes, as long as it's about meaningful issues. I don't particularly enjoy, but I'm OK with discussing non-meaningful issues. What I'm not OK with is disagreements that end up breaking the communication, specially when a crystal-clear case has been made (IMO), and the patch goes to limbo for no reason. That I think is a real problem. For this particular patch, I don't care if it goes in at the moment. I have something big on the pipeline, and I would rather drop this than loose penguin points, although I probably don't have any left. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
