On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 01:17:28AM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > SZEDER Gábor wrote: > > because nowadays __git_complete_file() is a wrapper around > > __git_complete_revlist_file(). > > What? It was never anything different from a poorly-named alias for > __git_complete_revlist_file().
Again: __git_complete_file() has been there since the completion script was first included in git. > You have already agreed that > __git_complete_file() is a horrible name, so why not deprecate it? I am not against deprecating it, and by "it" I mean the function name. > Whom is this confusion benefiting, and how is it any "cleaner"? It's clearer because of the reasons I gave in my other email in the discussion of the patch. Plus it would avoid commits on master with incorrect commit messages. > If > you're arguing about expanding __git_complete_file(), don't do that: > just write a new function and give it a proper name. I am not arguing about that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
