Duy Nguyen wrote: > libgit.a is just a way of grouping a bunch of objects together, not a > real library and not meant to be. If you aim something more organized, > please show at least a roadmap what to move where.
Exactly. There are some rough plans I would like to help with in the direction of a more organized source tree (so "ls" output can be less intimidating --- see Nico Pitre's mail on this a while ago for more hints), but randomly moving files one at a time to builtin/ destroys consistency and just makes things *worse*. So if you'd like to work on this, you'll need to start with a description of the endpoint, to help people work with you to ensure it is something consistent and usable. Actually, Felipe, I doubt that would work well. This project requires understanding how a variety of people use the git source code, which requires listening carefully to them and not alienating them so you can find out what they need. Someone good at moderating a discussion could do that on-list, but based on my experience of how threads with you go, a better strategy might be to cultivate a wiki page somewhere with a plan and give it some time (a month, maybe) to collect input. NAK to changing the meaning of builtin/ to "built-in commands, plus sequencer", which seriously hurts consistency. Sincerely, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
