On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Johan Herland <jo...@herland.net> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Felipe Contreras > <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: >>> Go back to my 261 commits, show me one that is "unmindful of technical >>> details". >> >> And you say this thread is an excellent example of your point that I'm >> unmindful of technical details? >> >> It's not. There are no technical details I was unmindful of in this thread. > > Ok, I'll bite (against my better judgment). From a related thread, a > few minutes ago: > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Felipe Contreras > <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Thomas Rast <tr...@inf.ethz.ch> wrote: >>> So you would deliberately break a bisection on this test file? >> No, this patch series won't be applied. > > Thomas points out a technical detail with the patch series, and the > answer given is 100% non-constructive.
Geezus! http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227109 There. Are you happy? I dropped the patches that are not part of the series. Who benefits from this? NOBODY. Certainly not the users. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
