On 2013-06-09 13:01:30 -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> You don't agree that 1) a collegial work environment is overrated, 2) > >> that the Linux kernel doesn't put an emphasis on being collegial, or > >> 3) that it's the most successful software project in history? > > > > Point 1. > > Good, so we agree that a project doesn't need a collegial work > environment to be extremely and amazingly successful. In fact, any > rational person would keep an open mind to the fact that perhaps it > actually _helps_ to not have such environment, based on the evidence.
Just from skimming both lists, most of the time I find lkml to be nicer (and more collegial) to read because it has a better atmosphere than git@ had in the last year or two. And yes, a good atmosphere plays an important role. One of the reasons is that it makes it easier to discern arguments based on personality disputes - which certainly exist on lk - from actual technical disagreements that need to be resolved. Greetings, Andres Freund -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
