Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> writes:
>> +++ b/diff.c
>> @@ -2647,6 +2647,10 @@ static int diff_populate_gitlink(struct diff_filespec
>> *s, int size_only)
>> int diff_populate_filespec(struct diff_filespec *s, int size_only)
>> {
>> int err = 0;
>> + enum safe_crlf crlf_warn = (safe_crlf != SAFE_CRLF_FAIL
>> + ? safe_crlf
>> + : SAFE_CRLF_WARN);
>
> Thanks,
> Does it makes sense to write it the other way around?
>
> enum safe_crlf crlf_warn = (safe_crlf == SAFE_CRLF_FAIL
> ? SAFE_CRLF_WARN
> : safe_crlf);
I didn't see much difference either way, but between "FAIL needs to
be demoted to WARN, everything else goes as-is" and the original "We
do not care about anything other than FAIL, so use it as-is, but
demote FAIL to WARN", yours look shorter. Will replace.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
