David Rothenberger wrote: > On 7/5/2013 8:41 PM, Kyle McKay wrote: >> Daniel Shahaf has suggested also setting >> "servers:global:http-bulk-updates=on". > > I have a patch that does this, but since turning on bulk updates has > a possible performance penalty, I prefer your approach.
I assume that's because http-bulk-updates defeats caching. If so, makes sense. Please forgive my ignorance: is there a bug filed about ra_serf's misbehavior here? Is it eventually going to be fixed and this is just a workaround, or is the growth in temp file use something we'd live with permanently? Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
