Johannes Sixt wrote: > Sorry, IMO, this goes into a totally wrong direction, in particular, I > think that this is going to close to door to make --lockref the default > some day in a way that helps everyone.
Would a '*' that acts like --lockref on a per ref basis address your concerns? I realize that that design would hurt a project of making '+' use lockref automatically some day. I think that's ok, and that '+' meaning "push whatever I have, regardless of what's on the other end, and I mean it" would be better semantics in the long term (which doesn't match the current behavior either :/). Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
