[administrivia: people on the original thread added back on CC] Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
> Anders Darander <anders.daran...@gmail.com> writes: > >>>> Do anyone have any better idea on how to approach this? >>> >>>Teaching "ls-files" to leave early once it seens even a single >>>output is probably a possibility. >> >> Would that mean that we're able to fail early? > > Heh, good point. "Leave once you find one path" does not help the > most common "sane" case where you do not kill any path, so it does > not help us at all. In any case, this is a regression introduced in 'master' since the last release, and the attempted fix was for an issue that has long been with us, so I'll revert a7365313 (git stash: avoid data loss when "git stash save" kills a directory, 2013-06-28) soon. For today's -rc3, I'm already deep into the integration cycle, so it is too late to do the revert it and then redo everything. Then we will plan to re-apply the patch once "ls-files --killed" gets fixed not to waste too much cycles needlessly, after the coming release. Thanks for a report and discussion. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
