Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes:
> @@ -21,4 +22,18 @@ test_expect_success 'ls-tree fails with non-zero exit code
> on broken tree' '
> test_must_fail git ls-tree -r HEAD
> '
>
> +test_expect_failure 'ls-tree directory core.ignorecase' '
> + cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
> + d/e/f
> + EOF
> + mkdir d &&
> + >d/e &&
> + git update-index --add -- d/e &&
> + rm d/e &&
> + mkdir d/e &&
> + >d/e/f &&
> + git -c core.ignorecase=true ls-files -k >actual &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> +'
Hmm. Wouldn't it be a clearer demonstration to add to t3010 another
invocation of "ls-files -k" that was added by 3c568751 (t3010:
update to demonstrate "ls-files -k" optimization pitfalls,
2013-08-15) but with core.ignorecase=true? Something like...
t/t3010-ls-files-killed-modified.sh | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t3010-ls-files-killed-modified.sh
b/t/t3010-ls-files-killed-modified.sh
index 6ea7ca8..f4783ed 100755
--- a/t/t3010-ls-files-killed-modified.sh
+++ b/t/t3010-ls-files-killed-modified.sh
@@ -90,6 +90,17 @@ pathx/ju/nk
EOF
test_expect_success \
+ 'git ls-files -k to show killed files (with icase)' \
+ 'git -c core.ignorecase=true ls-files -k >.output'
+cat >.expected <<EOF
+path0/file0
+path1/file1
+path2
+path3
+pathx/ju/nk
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success \
'validate git ls-files -k output.' \
'test_cmp .expected .output'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
