A previous patch ensures that both the replaced and the replacement
objects passed to git replace must be of the same type, except if
-f option is used.

While at it state that there is no other restriction on both objects.

Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chrisc...@tuxfamily.org>
---
 Documentation/git-replace.txt | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-replace.txt b/Documentation/git-replace.txt
index e0b4057..d198006 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-replace.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-replace.txt
@@ -20,8 +20,13 @@ The name of the 'replace' reference is the SHA-1 of the 
object that is
 replaced. The content of the 'replace' reference is the SHA-1 of the
 replacement object.
 
+The replaced object and the replacement object must be of the same type.
+This restriction can be bypassed using `-f`.
+
 Unless `-f` is given, the 'replace' reference must not yet exist.
 
+There is no other restriction on the replaced and replacement objects.
+
 Replacement references will be used by default by all Git commands
 except those doing reachability traversal (prune, pack transfer and
 fsck).
@@ -69,9 +74,7 @@ go back to a replaced commit will move the branch to the 
replacement
 commit instead of the replaced commit.
 
 There may be other problems when using 'git rev-list' related to
-pending objects. And of course things may break if an object of one
-type is replaced by an object of another type (for example a blob
-replaced by a commit).
+pending objects.
 
 SEE ALSO
 --------
-- 
1.8.4.rc1.28.ge2684af


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to