Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> writes:

>> +static int have_same_root(const char *path1, const char *path2)
>> +{
>> +    int is_abs1, is_abs2;
>> +
>> +    is_abs1 = is_absolute_path(path1);
>> +    is_abs2 = is_absolute_path(path2);
>> +    return (is_abs1 && is_abs2 && !strncasecmp(path1, path2, 1)) ||
>                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^
> I wonder: should strncasecmp() be replaced with strncmp_icase() ?

True.

> See dir.c: 
> int strncmp_icase(const char *a, const char *b, size_t count)
> {
>       return ignore_case ? strncasecmp(a, b, count) : strncmp(a, b, count);
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to