On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:37:08AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I wonder if GCC has changed it's behaviour to more closely match C99. > > Clang as a compatibility article about this sort of issue: > > > > http://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.html#inline > > Interesting. The ways the page suggests as fixes are > > - change it to a "statis inline"; > - remove "inline" from the definition; > - provide an external (non-inline) def somewhere else; > - compile with gnu899 dialect.
Right, option 3 seems perfectly reasonable to me, as we must be prepared to cope with a decision not to inline the function, and there has to be _some_ linked implementation. But shouldn't libc be providing an external, linkable strcasecmp in this case? -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
