On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:25:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hansen <rhan...@bbn.com> wrote: > > > > Is it worthwhile to poke a lawyer about this as a precaution? (If so, > > who?) Or do we wait for a motivating event? > > I can poke the lawyer that was originally involved.
For what it's worth, there is an existing push to clarify the licensing terms for the DCO [1]. Involved parties include Luis Rodriguez, Richard Fontana, Bradley Kuhn, Mike Dolan, and Karen Copenhaver. Hopefully they'll have something to say after the New Orleans LinuxCon. The DCO licensing is not quite the same as changing the DCO text, but they're probably closely related ;). Cheers, Trevor [1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1397613/focus=1400065 -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
