Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:47:51AM +0200, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: > >> >> > it still ends up as a single function call). The downside is that it has >> >> > to be remembered at each site that uses strcasecmp, but we do not use >> >> > pointers to standard library functions very often. >> >> >> >> Is it possible to add a test which fails if wrapper is not used? >> > >> > No test needed for this, as compilation or linkage will fail, I think. >> >> But only when someone compiles on MinGW, no? > > Yeah. I think a more clear way to phrase the question would be: is there > some trick we can use to booby-trap strcasecmp as a function pointer so > that it fails to compile even on systems where it would otherwise work?
That line of thought nudges us toward the place Linus explicitly said he didn't want to see us going, no? We do not particularly want to care the exact nature of the breakage on MinGW. Do we really want to set a booby-trap that intimately knows about how their strcasecmp is broken, and possibly cover breakages of the same kind but with other functions? It isn't like "we are deliberately relying on this non-standard behaviour we see on the system _we_ commonly use, and somebody on a new strictly POSIX platform may be bitten by it", in which case it would make sense to have a test that intimately knows about the non-standard behaviour we rely on. This case is a total opposite. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
