Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > Yeah, you are right[1]. I'm happy to re-roll. I wonder if we even need > to worry about a compatibility wrapper. We are already doing pointer > manipulations, and it is probably just as readable to roll the loop by > hand.
Yeah, unrolling the loop is probably better. You may even be able to do so in a single pass with an extra "last > seen" pointer variable without too much additional code complexity, I would think. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
