On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Christian Couder <chrisc...@tuxfamily.org> writes: >> From: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> >> >>> But that is insufficient to emulate what we do, no? I.e. append >>> unless the last one is from the same person we are about to add. >> >> Yeah, but, with DONT_REPEAT_PREVIOUS, it would be possible using: >> >> [trailer "signoff"] >> key = "Signed-off-by:" >> if_exist = dont_repeat_previous >> if_missing = append >> command = echo "$GIT_COMMITTER_NAME <$GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL>"' > > Anything is possible, but "possible" does not justify "it is better > way than other possible ways". > > What are the plausible values for if_missing? If if_missing needs > "prepend", for example, in addition to "append", does it mean > if_exist also needs corresponding "prepend" variant for the value > "dont_repeat_previous" you would give to if_exist?
Yeah, we could add "prepend" to the possible values for if_missing and also other values that prepend instead of append to if_exist. But I am not sure they would be as useful. If we think they are useful, then maybe we could instead add another configuration to say if we want to append or prepend or put in the middle, and change the others to make them clearer. For example we could have: where = (after | middle | before) if_exist = (add_if_different | add_if_neighbor_different | add | overwrite | do_nothing) if_missing = (do_nothing | add) (The default being the first choice.) > Having two that are seemingly independent configuration does not > seem to be helping in reducing complexity (by keeping settings that > can be independently set orthogonal, by saying "if the other rule > decides to add, do we append, prepend, insert at the middle?", for > example). I am not sure I understand what you mean. In my opinion, if we want to use just one configuration, instead of 2 or 3, it will not reduce complexity. Maybe we could parse something like: style = if_exist:add_if_different:after, if_missing:add:before or like: style = (append | prepend | insert | append_unless <regexp> | prepend_unless <regexp> | insert_unless <regexp>) with <regexp> being a regexp where $KEY is the key and $VALUE is the value, so you can say: append_unless ^$KEY[:=]$VALUE.* or like: style = (append_if <cmd> | prepend_if <cmd> | insert_if <cmd>) with <cmd> being a shell command that should exit with code 0. (The command would be passed the existing trailers in stdin. So you could say things like: "append_if true" or "append_if tail -1 | grep -v '$KEY: $VALUE'") But if we want to keep things simple, I think what I suggest first above is probably best. And by the way, later we might add "add_if_match <regexp>" or "add_if_true <cmd>" to "if_exist" and "if_missing", so we could still be as powerful as the other styles. > How would one differentiate between "there is a field with that key" > and "there is a field with that <key, value> combination" with a > single if_exist? Add another variable if_exist_exact? "if_exist = do_nothing" would mean: "do nothing if there is a field with that key" "if_exist = overwrite" would mean: "overwrite the existing value of a field with that key" "if_exist = add" would mean: "add if there is one or more fields with that key (whatever the value(s), so the value(s) could be the same)" "if_exist = add_if_different" would mean: "add only if there is no field with the same <key, value> pair" "if_exist = add_if_different_neighbor" would mean: "add only if there is no field with the same <key, value> pair where we are going to add" "if_missing = do_nothing" would mean: "do nothing if there is no field with that key" "if_missing= add" would mean: "add if there is no field with that key" "where = after" would mean: "if we decide to add, we will put the trailer after the other trailers" "where = middle" would mean: "if we decide to add, we will put the trailer in the middle of the other trailers" "where = before" would mean: "if we decide to add, we will put the trailer before the other trailers" In my opinion, that should be enough for most use cases. It is true that some people might want something more complex (like adding only if there is no value for the same key that match a given regexp) or something stranger like adding only if there is already a field with the same <key, value> pair. But we can take care of these special cases later if they actually happen. Then we will hopefully have more experience. And we could add things like "add_if_no_value_match <regexp>" or "add_if <cmd>" to if_exist and if_missing . Thanks, Christian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
