Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > Actually, to me, I found the "two sentences" the worst part in the > original. It made it sound as if the default will be switching to > 'upstream', and all readers need to read the second sentence that > clarifies that it is not the case, in a somewhat round-about > way---"will only succeed if" invites "and otherwise...?"
To me, this is not an issue given the audience (people too lazy to read the docs): for them, current == simple == upstream modulo details they're not interested about. The safety measure of "simple" is actually here to make sure nothing wrong happens if they make the confusion. But that's just a preference, I'm OK with your other proposal too. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
