Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> In that case I think git-compat-util.h should include something like >> what block-sha1/sha1.c has: >> >> #if !defined(__i386__) && !defined(__x86_64__) && \ >> !defined(_M_IX86) && !defined(_M_X64) && \ >> !defined(__ppc__) && !defined(__ppc64__) && \ >> !defined(__powerpc__) && !defined(__powerpc64__) && \ >> !defined(__s390__) && !defined(__s390x__) >> #define NEEDS_ALIGNED_ACCESS >> #endif >> >> Otherwise we are relying on the person building to know their own >> architecture intimately, which shouldn't be necessary. > > Yeah, I agree it would be nice to autodetect. The nice thing is that false positives are harmless, modulo slowing down git a little if the compiler doesn't figure out how to optimize the NEEDS_ALIGNED_ACCESS codepath when on an unlisted platform that doesn't, in fact, need aligned access. In other words, it would work out of the box for everybody. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
