David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
> Ok, I now wrote
>
> for (p = buf;; num++, p++) {
> p = memchr(p, '\n', end - p);
> if (!p)
> break;
> }
Looks still wrong (perhaps this is a taste issue).
num++ is not "loop control", but the real action of this
loop to count lines. It is better left inside.
p++ is "loop control", and belongs to the third part of
for(;;).
Isn't the normal continuation condition "p < end"?
so something like
for (p = buf; p < end; p++) {
p = find the end of this line
if (!p)
break;
num++;
}
perhaps?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
