Kirill Smelkov <k...@navytux.spb.ru> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:42:41AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Kirill Smelkov <k...@navytux.spb.ru> writes:
>>
>> > I agree object data should be immutable for good. The only thing I'm
>> > talking
>> > about here is mode, which is parsed from a tree buffer and is stored in
>> > separate field:
>>
>> Ah, I do not see any problem in that case, then.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Thanks, that simplifies things for me.
Surely.
Be careful when traversing N-trees in parallel---you may have to
watch out for the entry ordering rules that sorts the following
paths in the order shown:
a
a-b
a/b
a_b
Inside a single tree, you cannot have 'a' and 'a/b' at the same
time, but one tree may have 'a' (without 'a/b') while another one
may have 'a/b' (without 'a'), and walking them in parallel has
historically been one source of funny bugs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
