> I just don't want to regress somebody else's workflow due > to my lack of imagination.
This makes a lot of sense to me, although as-is the function emits a warning and returns immediately (although with a successful status code), so I'm also stumped as to what kind of workflow this would be included in. In any case, if the jury's out on this one, I suppose the two patches I submitted are good to merge? Part of me thinks the bump from warning to error belongs in its own patch anyway. - Brian Gesiak -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
