Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:51 AM, He Sun <sunheeh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2014-03-01 19:21 GMT+08:00 Faiz Kothari <faiz.of...@gmail.com>: >>> diff --git a/remote-curl.c b/remote-curl.c >>> index 10cb011..dee8716 100644 >>> --- a/remote-curl.c >>> +++ b/remote-curl.c >>> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static int rpc_service(struct rpc_state *rpc, struct >>> discovery *heads) >>> if (start_command(&client)) >>> exit(1); >>> if (preamble) >>> - write_or_die(client.in, preamble->buf, preamble->len); >>> + strbuf_write_or_die(client.in, preamble); >>> if (heads) >>> write_or_die(client.in, heads->buf, heads->len); >> >> This should be changed. May be you can use Ctrl-F to search write_or_die(). >> Or if you are using vim, use "/ and n" to find all. > > It's not obvious from the patch fragment, but 'heads' is not a strbuf, > so Faiz correctly left this invocation alone.
That is a very good sign why this change is merely a code-churn and not an improvement, isn't it? We know (and any strbuf user should know) that ->buf and ->len are the ways to learn the pointer and the length the strbuf holds. Why anybody thinks it is benefitial to introduce another function that is _only_ for writing out strbuf and cannot be used to write out a plain buffer is simply beyond me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
